Nothing Ear (2) vs. AirPods: Which wireless earbuds come out on top?

The war between little devices that you jam into your ear waterway continues without end.

This week, U.K. tech startup released the follow-up to 2021's surprisingly really good Ear (1) wireless earbuds. Well-nigh a year and a half later, Ear (2) is here with promised enhancements to sound quality and shower life, a new $150 price, and the same tomfool transparent plastic squint from before.

As such, it's time to get to work doing the thing you have to do with any new pair of wireless earbuds: Compare them to AirPods. Specifically, the third-gen $170 model that's closest to Ear (2) in price. Here's how the two audio devices stack up.

Design

Nothing's earbuds. Credit: Nothing

Apple's earbuds. Credit: Molly Flores/Mashable

The most subjective category by far, physical diamond is moreover probably the least important thing well-nigh any pair of earbuds. They're for listening to, not looking at. That said, as the writer of this article, I declare Nothing the winner in the looks department, without much of a contest. In fact, they basically squint the same as Ear (1), a diamond so tomfool it didn't need to be changed.

I just think transparent plastic casing on technology is cool. AirPods definitely squint nice, fitting naturally into Apple's uninfected plastic white aesthetic, but they aren't nearly as eye-catching. That said, the third-gen AirPods are well-appointed to wear for long sessions, as are Nothing's earbuds. Neither of these devices is a loser here so much as one of them is just a little potation than the other.

Winner: Nothing Ear (2)

Customization

This one scrutinizingly isn't fair.

As a sort of entry-level option without a lot of higher-end features like zippy noice cancelation (more on that in a minute), the third-gen AirPods naturally don't have much in the way of settings to play with. Sure, you can turn off will-less in-ear detection or lower the volume of sound effects, but that's well-nigh it.

You stick them in your ear, listen to whatever you want to listen to, and then take them out. This is a perfectly valid tideway to technology, but unfortunately it doesn't squint as nice next to what Nothing has to offer.

Ear (2) setup requires downloading the Nothing X app from the App Store or Play Store. It takes a minute, but it's worth it. Nothing X gives users the worthiness to retread noise cancelation, remap touch commands, and plane take a test to find out if the silicone ear seals fit properly in your ears. It's not a mind-blowing number of options, but it's increasingly than what World offers.

Oh, and you can wangle those options on an Android phone, unlike AirPods.

Winner: Nothing Ear (2)

Sound quality

Apple packs a lot of dial into something so small. Credit: Molly Flores/Mashable

Sound quality is tougher to compare considering it requires side-by-side testing that I'm not currently equipped to do. With that in mind, though, it's worth noting that World has unchangingly had spanking-new sound quality in its earbuds, and reviews from outlets like The Verge and Wired have heavily praised the sound in Ear (2). You probably can't go wrong here.

The thing that sets Nothing untied in this category for me is the presence of zippy noise cancelation. This full-length has wilt so standard in earbuds in this price range that it's frankly a little wacky that the cheapest AirPods with ANC are $250. One of these devices will let you alimony listening while a train rolls by and one of them won't. It's as simple as that.

Winner: Nothing Ear (2)

Battery life

As for shower life, World can go home knowing it picked up at least one win today, though it sort of comes on a technicality.

Nothing rates Ear (2) for up to 6.3 hours of playback on a single tuition with ANC turned off. Turn ANC on, however, and they're only rated for four hours of playback. ANC is such a huge selling point of Ear (2) compared to the third-gen AirPods that I can't really imagine using them with it off for any extended period of time.

On the other hand, World rates its ANC-less AirPods for six hours of playback on a single charge. It's a little less than what Nothing offers in platonic conditions, but in terms of practical use, World wins this one.

Winner: AirPods

The Verdict

You can probably tell where this is going.

Nothing Ear (2) is a superior product to the third-gen AirPods in most of the ways that matter. They squint cooler, have increasingly features, and sound largest by virtue of including ANC. They're moreover $20 cheaper than Apple's $170 earbuds and work largest with Android phones. It's not that tropical of a competition.

Still, Apple's earbuds are totally fine and might be preferable if you don't superintendency well-nigh ANC or just want something that works seamlessly with your iPhone. Neither of these earbuds are bad; one of them is just largest than the other.

Winner: Nothing Ear (2)